Asrock B550M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B550M-C  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 18:29
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 167
2-Core 333
103% 194 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 910
96% 769 Pts
64-Core 1025
63% 1025 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$253
EVGA(3842 3656) ≥ 4GB; EVGA Nvidia RTX 3060
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 120
Parallax 125
109% 126 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 103
Splatting 88.9
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,050
Write 1,956
Mixed 1,757
429% 1,921 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 76.7
288% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,383
DQ Write 1,060
DQ Mixed 1,072
842% 1,172 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 271%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
90GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 100
Mixed 85
72% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 248GB
181GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 35.5
Write 18.6
Mixed 22.7
30% 25.6 MB/s
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.6
153% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 33.9
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 35
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550M-C Builds (Compare 1,227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $481
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback