Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics95.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory88.2 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220628
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 18:14
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3223
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 193
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 593
54% 455 Pts
64-Core 1,064
66% 1,064 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver:
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.9% Outstanding
Lighting 109
Reflection 99.3
Parallax 239
89% 149 fps
MRender 211
Gravity 102
Splatting 106
110% 140 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1270
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 955
Write 2,033
Mixed 1353
328% 1,447 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 57.2
212% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 814
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 535
397% 541 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 30%
Apple SM1024G PCIe 1TB
184GB free
Firmware: BXZ83A0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1345 1297 1433 1234 765 610 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,527
Write 1,460
Mixed 811
SusWrite 1114
275% 1,228 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 59.7
209% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 617
DQ Write 451
DQ Mixed 576
419% 548 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 218%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM HMA81GR7AFR8N-VK H... 96GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 61.2
MC Mixed 46.9
138% 48.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 8.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 117%
Great: 159%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback