Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6502ZC_K6502ZC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6502ZC_K6502ZC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6502ZC
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 14:00
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 69.2
1-Core 180
2-Core 347
103% 199 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,032
104% 842 Pts
64-Core 1635
101% 1635 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.4% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 66.2
58% 69 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 54.3
Splatting 54.1
47% 58.2 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU010TZ 1TB
722GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1041 1209 1227 1446 1470 1407 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,880
Write 1,345
Mixed 1,155
SusWrite 1300
318% 1,420 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 74.5
239% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 866
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 549
420% 583 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 256%
Great: 387%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAB2GS6CMR6N-XN Corsair CMSX16GX4M1A3200C22 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 30.4
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 21.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6502ZC_K6502ZC Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6502ZC_K6502ZC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback