Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	38.1% Below average	Memory 53.7 1-Core 31.7 2-Core 63.1 32% 49.5 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 264 22% 193 Pts	64-Core 1,616 100% 1,616 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Dell PERC H710 600GB 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.13 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Seagate BUP Slim SL 1TB 4,641 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 49GB free Firmware: 0302 Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Read 34.2 Write 30.6 Mixed 32 24% 32.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 2.11 4K Mixed 0.31 96% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B2G70BH0-YH9 8x16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 8 of 24 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	54.5% Above average	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 24.8 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 3.3 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	11x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	5x

GPU
Quadro M5000NvidiaBench 50%, 1,540 samples	6x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	5x
SSD 1TBPcieBench 292%, 19,971 samples	2x

RAM
HMT84GL7BMR4C-RD 002C04B3002C 72JSZS4G72L1G9E2A7 00AD04B300AD HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 00AD063200AD HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 002C04B3002C 72JSZS4G72L1G9E2A7 00AD04B300AD HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 191GBUnknownBench 75%, 9 samples	6x
HMT84GL7AMR4A-PB 8x31.9GBHynixBench 43%, 5 samples	4x
HMT84GL7AMR4C-RD 4x31.8GBHynixBench 71%, 22 samples	3x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $625

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16