Lenovo 20EGS01E01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20EGS01E01  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EGS01E01
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 16 '17 at 15:10
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 167
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 233
33% 242 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2211) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3412
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 6.19
4% 5.69 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.63
Splatting 8.48
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 501
Write 94.8
Mixed 133
52% 243 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 24.1
120% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 67.2
87% 162 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 95%
ST975042 0AS 750GB
98GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 38.8
Write 39.2
Mixed 39
50% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.66
4K Mixed 0.18
30% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback