HP EliteBook 840 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83B2
Memory12.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220915
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 08:10
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User AFG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8650U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 74
1-Core 110
2-Core 195
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 319
34% 274 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 83B2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.73 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 8.9
6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV21H3Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 428
Write 422
Mixed 367
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 38.2
130% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 280
220% 307 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 115%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 500GB
31GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1 1 1 1 1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 1
1% 0.77 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Mixed 0
226% 20.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 21.9
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G5 Builds (Compare 3,897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback