Intel Emerald Lake 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemIntel C76H
MotherboardIntel Emerald Lake 2  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '17 at 13:21
Run Duration441 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 87.5
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 99.5
52% 79 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 126
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Intel(8086 2010) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 2.66
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.17
Splatting 7.39
4% 4.49 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ADATA_IHSS312-128GM 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: r0.24.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.9% Below average
Read 352
Write 117
Mixed 126
43% 198 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 1.65
47% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 3.16
14% 30.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 35%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
6GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Read 19.1
Write 2.62
Mixed 4.21
8% 8.63 MB/s
4K Read 3.79
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.01
15% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD3SHT4GG5WB-CKGAC 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.8% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.9
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Emerald Lake 2 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel Emerald Lake 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback