Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-A R2.0  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 13 '23 at 22:00
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 227
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 272
39% 288 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$253
Asus(1043 8818) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 120
Parallax 127
110% 128 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 104
Splatting 90.3
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 337 336 446 455 434 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 394
Write 425
Mixed 344
SusWrite 381
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 32.5
123% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 195
172% 253 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$95
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 27.3
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 15.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-A R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-A R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback