Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Memory 61.2 1-Core 51 2-Core 74.4 40% 62.2 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 118 15% 113 Pts	64-Core 114 7% 114 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420M 1,922 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0487) 1GB CLim: 500 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	2.53% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 0.7 2% 2.57 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 3.2 Splatting 4.1 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.53% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: GT001L SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 70 53 43 65 73 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 56.1 Write 70.9 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 60 38% 52 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F Compustocx (CSX) 4GB 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.1% Poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 8 20% 7.17 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core i3 M 330IntelBench 38%, 14,119 samples	1x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	1x
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F Compustocx (CSX) 4GBUnknownBench 21%, 1 sample	1x
Tigo 2x2GBUnknownBench 44%, 6 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16