Acidanthera iMac17,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcidanthera iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardAcidanthera Mac-DB15BD556843C820
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '23 at 17:41
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 186
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 506
48% 399 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.9% Excellent
Lighting 85.7
Reflection 132
Parallax 164
70% 127 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 88.8
Splatting 154
117% 143 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 227 234 237 236 236 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 450
Mixed 304
SusWrite 230
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 39.3
150% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 252
215% 316 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 105%
SABRENT 120GB
52GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 136 64 72 64 63 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 32%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
434GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 111 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 100
Mixed 98.9
SusWrite 110
75% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 7113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 180 182 182 184 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 90
Mixed 108
SusWrite 181
101% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
4TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 161 161 160 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 165
Mixed 107
SusWrite 160
204% 154 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 1.1
513% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 1
404% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 19.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Acidanthera iMac17,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback