Asus H97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H97-PRO GAMER (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '23 at 13:23
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 102 2-Core 205 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 480 48% 392 Pts	64-Core 508 32% 508 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP M700 240GB 1,407 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1117B1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 492 Write 341 Mixed 415 92% 416 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 30.4 127% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 48.6 98% 194 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 105%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60 18,782 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 356GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 117 Write 102 Mixed 73.2 72% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 85%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$37 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 46GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 52.5 Write 31.9 Mixed 28 28% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 59%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$32 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 725GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 120 Write 119 Mixed 111 88% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 2GB 725 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1603 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 17.4 Write 6.2 Mixed 5 10% 9.53 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 36% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GLK64W6H 4x8GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 16.4 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 19.8 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PRO GAMER - $193

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	223x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	213x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	156x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	61x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	39x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	37x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	56x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	33x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $628

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16