Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31270 3,539 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 168 70% 116 Pts	4-Core 284 8-Core 412 44% 348 Pts	64-Core 428 26% 428 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 3658) 2GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Lighting 18.6 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 16.7 15% 17.6 fps	MRender 22.7 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 15.8 15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 261 201 178 175 174 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 475 Write 385 Mixed 317 SusWrite 211 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 35.4 124% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 252 215% 317 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax FLFF65F-D8WM9 2x4GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	45.8% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 14.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 14 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	3x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSD 240GBGigabyte $32Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	2x
X400 2.5 7MM 256GBSandiskBench 72%, 2,307 samples	2x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 12GBKingstonBench 37%, 144 samples	2x
ST102464BA160B.16F 1x8GBCrucialBench 31%, 827 samples	2x
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 16GBHynixBench 53%, 92 samples	2x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87