Intel JSL MRD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel Jasper Lake Client Platform
MotherboardIntel JSL MRD  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220921
Uptime15.6 Days
Run DateJan 13 '23 at 04:06
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Memory 32.7
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 87.9
33% 57.5 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 117
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 4.9
3% 4.67 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 6.3
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimtigo 256GB 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10694
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 270 342 312 342 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 317
Write 357
Mixed 324
SusWrite 316
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 25.1
85% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 226
170% 228 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.2% Below average
MC Read 9
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 4.1
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical JSL MRD Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel JSL MRD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback