Asus STRIX B250F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX B250F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '23 at 22:19
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$88
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 375
47% 360 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2277 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 528.02
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 108
Parallax 67.3
57% 81.8 fps
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 66.9
61% 69.6 fps
Poor: 48% Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1181 1285 1537 1509 1363 729 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,660
Write 1,632
Mixed 1,233
SusWrite 1,267
326% 1,448 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 84.5
286% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 758
DQ Write 923
DQ Mixed 333
392% 671 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 270%
Great: 277%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
816GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 177 178 177 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 126
Mixed 96.2
SusWrite 176
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
250% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G KHX3200C16D4/8GX 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX B250F GAMING Builds (Compare 2,575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus STRIX B250F GAMING - $182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback