Medion Specialist P10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics83.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMedion Specialist P10  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NPx0PNP
Memory33 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '23 at 20:01
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 61
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 125
55% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 229
25% 198 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 866C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2802
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.6% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 78.3
Parallax 108
88% 98 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 82.1
76% 94.8 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E19-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R 1TB
697GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM32.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2447 2443 1777 2191 2268 1878 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,270
Write 2,499
Mixed 1,345
SusWrite 2,167
414% 1,820 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 60.6
214% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 256
193% 260 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 261%
Great: 376%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) PSD432G32002S Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 39GB
3200, 3200 MHz
32767, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.2% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 22.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Specialist P10 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Medion Specialist P10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback