LG 15U780-PA5HK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG 15U780-PA5HK  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 15U780
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime20 Days
Run DateJan 12 '23 at 17:56
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 72
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 145
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 190
29% 209 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1854 0307) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6576
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 5
5% 15.5 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 4.8
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1009 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 111 106 111 110 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 419
Write 362
Mixed 278
SusWrite 114
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 27.1
59% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 223
177% 249 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 84%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
215GB free
Firmware: AM0P6L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 107 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 88.6
Write 97.5
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 107
59% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.8% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.9
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 10.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15U780-PA5HK Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: LG 15U780-PA5HK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback