Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL Intel H110 Series
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '23 at 15:58
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 99%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 131
55% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 265
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 91% Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 141 145 108 131 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 350
Write 322
Mixed 299
SusWrite 129
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 17
56% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 182
167% 253 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
712GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 9.2 7.7 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 24
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback