Supermicro C9X299-PGF

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 122% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 3 months ago.

System	Supermicro C9X299-PGF (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro C9X299-PGF
Memory	58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170922
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '23 at 12:30
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993 4,653 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 73.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 194 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 828 73% 622 Pts	64-Core 2,459 152% 2,459 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% PNY(196E 1211) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 166 Reflection 182 Parallax 165 135% 171 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 168 Splatting 119 112% 138 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KB480G7 480GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 314GB free (System drive) Firmware: SCV10100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 338 337 328 323 319 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 293 Write 336 Mixed 310 SusWrite 329 72% 317 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 71.2 4K Mixed 26.9 99% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 222 182% 255 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 81%
Samsung MZQL2960HCJR-00A07 960GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 311% 851GB free Firmware: GDC5302Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1439 1440 1439 1439 1440 1440 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	289% Outstanding	Read 2,293 Write 1,440 Mixed 1,776 SusWrite 1,440 389% 1,737 MB/s	4K Read 48.1 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 70.9 233% 83.2 MB/s	DQ Read 892 DQ Write 750 DQ Mixed 800 605% 814 MB/s
Poor: 256% ↑ This bench: 289% Great: 349%
Seagate ST10000NM0016-1T 10TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 9.5TB free Firmware: SNB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 222 218 220 236 231 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD CT16G4DFD824A.C16FHD CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	106% Outstanding	MC Read 36.8 MC Write 55.4 MC Mixed 37.3 123% 43.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 9.7 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 92.6 43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C9X299-PGF Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 131%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 166%

UFO

System: Supermicro C9X299-PGF

CPU
Core i9-9980XEIntel $1,097Bench 83%, 2,201 samples	5x
Core i9-7980XEIntel $993Bench 80%, 4,653 samples	3x
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	4x
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples	4x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	4x

SSD
MZQL2960HCJR-00A07 960GBSamsungBench 311%, 25 samples	8x
860 Pro 512GBSamsung $150Bench 110%, 16,934 samples	2x
SSDSC2KB240G7 240GBIntelBench 61%, 118 samples	2x

RAM
9905701-017.A00G 4x16GBKingstonBench 90%, 83 samples	4x
CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD CT16G4DFD824A.C16FHD CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD 64GBUnknownBench 108%, 2 samples	2x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 4x8GBMicronBench 89%, 473 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,538

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16