Asrock X99 WS-E/10G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99 WS-E/10G  (all builds)
Memory54.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160627
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '23 at 09:02
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 224
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 721
70% 572 Pts
64-Core 903
56% 903 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 153
Parallax 142
113% 144 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 150
Splatting 128
109% 133 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320
822GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 216 210 209 206 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 293
Mixed 318
SusWrite 219
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 43
145% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 345
257% 343 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 93%
Great: 130%
Seagate ST8000VN0002-1Z8112 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 213 212 216 216 218 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4265 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 46.9
MC Mixed 43.5
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 26.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 115%
Great: 152%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 WS-E/10G Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS-E/10G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $863
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback