Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Memory 37.7 1-Core 15.5 2-Core 15.1 18% 22.8 Pts	4-Core 28 8-Core 28.3 4% 28.1 Pts	64-Core 7.5 0% 7.5 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 052D) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.74% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.27 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1 1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.74% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5075GSX 500GB-$127 6,562 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 454GB free (System drive) Firmware: GT001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 73 88 66 87 85 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 77.1 Write 81.2 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 77.6 46% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GB 8,570 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.63% Terrible	MC Read 2.4 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 2.9 7% 2.47 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.4 GB/s	Latency 213 19% 213 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 7.63% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	6x
C-50AMDBench 21%, 1,781 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6250AMDBench 1%, 1,583 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6310 Graphics (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)AMDBench 1%, 53 samples	1x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 1x2GBKingstonBench 18%, 620 samples	1x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	1x
ACR128X64D3S1333C9 ACR256X64D3S1333C9 3GBKingstonBench 19%, 77 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16