Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_A509FA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_A509FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509FAC
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 12 '23 at 07:57
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 89.3
56% 86 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 208
24% 188 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1B12) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.1
4% 3.97 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 7.8
5% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,217
Write 840
Mixed 848
214% 968 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 56
194% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 595
DQ Write 413
DQ Mixed 238
250% 415 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 189%
Seagate ST1000VT001-1RE172 1TB
672GB free
Firmware: SDC3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 110 110 114 115 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 65.7
Write 112
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 110
58% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Transcend JM2666HSB-8G 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.9% Average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 14.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_A509FA Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_A509FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback