Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '23 at 03:06
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 212
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 565
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CSSD-M2O1TEG2VNQ 1TB
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 341 347 361 353 354 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 356
Write 353
Mixed 349
SusWrite 347
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 59.5
196% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 577
378% 444 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 114%
Great: 196%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 145 146 145 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 164
Write 137
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 145
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 1
37% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 1.6
3% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 39%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
401GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 84 85 85 86 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PUD31600C118GVS Kingston 99U5403-082.A00LF Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback