TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 12 '23 at 00:42
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 169
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 406
42% 341 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 63.2%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Dell(1028 2B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1295 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 45.7
Parallax 28
16% 31.1 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 22
Splatting 26.7
21% 25.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 17.5%
 Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA1102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 157 145 171 314 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 393
Write 345
Mixed 356
SusWrite 216
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 24.6
74% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 241
172% 224 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 61.9%
 Great: 100%
PNY CS1030 250GB SSD
44GB free
Firmware: CS103600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 302 318 338 153 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 290
Write 296
Mixed 298
SusWrite 236
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 32.7
109% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 344
253% 332 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑
This bench: 74.4%
 Great: 226%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
925GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 180 181 182 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 162
Mixed 94
SusWrite 180
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 15.4
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 50.6%
 Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel  $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples1,029x
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples856x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples313x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples993x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples335x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples226x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples146x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples52x
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples41x
RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples53x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples40x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples26x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback