Anbernic Win600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAnbernic Win600  (all builds)
MotherboardAnbernic 6Q14DRW80
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display720 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 23:25
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 43
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 99.2
38% 66.3 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 142
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 7.5
4% 6.53 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.8
6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dogfish 1TB 1TB
525GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 28 188 256 252 271 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 348
Write 248
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 168
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 0.3
30% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 71.4
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 0.5
32% 75.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S32S682LJJJ43-12 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.2% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 189
21% 189 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Win600 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Anbernic Win600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback