Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook DBIIP301
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 12:28
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 60
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 142
52% 91 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 237
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(3100 0002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1960
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.7% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 3
Parallax 5.3
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.7%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 106 134 133 139 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 336
Write 135
Mixed 282
SusWrite 140
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 23.7
82% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 234
174% 229 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.2
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-H-103

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback