Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z170-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-HD3  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 05:04
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 156
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 276
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 37.7
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 44
31% 41.8 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 29.5
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDRE250GB-LT 250GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1026A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 221 187 167 175 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 427
Write 290
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 182
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 26.8
85% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 182
163% 246 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 100%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
98GB free
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 140 130 132 124 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 373
Write 325
Mixed 270
SusWrite 157
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 6.8
43% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 92.6
DQ Mixed 17.8
37% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 56%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
571GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 412 425 447 453 453 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 410
Mixed 389
SusWrite 427
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 49.4
152% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 363
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 108%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
604GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 412 425 447 453 453 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 396
Mixed 385
SusWrite 426
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 47.8
152% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 107%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C17 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 25.8
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 23.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback