Gigabyte GA-G1.SNIPER B7-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte G1.SNIPER B7
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.SNIPER B7-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 22:17
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
50% Average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 163
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 198
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1390 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.4% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 94.3
55% 67.8 fps
MRender 60.4
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 47.4
47% 58.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teutons Osmium M.2 NVMe 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 331 289 224 71 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,492
Write 502
Mixed 596
SusWrite 242
155% 708 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 26.1
150% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 395
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 307
271% 401 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 138%
Great: 167%
Ramsta S800 120GB
15GB free
Firmware: RS71V0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 457
Write 393
Mixed 372
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 24.2
102% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 37
64% 124 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 79%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
214GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 84 81 85 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 114
Write 106
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 81.5
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD2400U1708JY Transcend JM3200HLB-8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 12.2
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.SNIPER B7-CF Builds (Compare 711 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.SNIPER B7-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback