TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu CELSIUS M7010power

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M7010power  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3498-U2
Memory153.6 GB free of 160 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 17:34
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GRL-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 61.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 256
79% 150 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 980
86% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,569
97% 1,569 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 76%
 Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A5000
Nvidia(10DE 147E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
165% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 231
Parallax 234
184% 230 fps
MRender 296
Gravity 180
Splatting 180
174% 219 fps
Poor: 154% ↑
This bench: 165%
 Great: 172%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B07 1TB
815GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7602Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1165 1679 1745 1751 1857 1902 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,008
Write 1,746
Mixed 1,796
SusWrite 1,683
407% 1,808 MB/s
4K Read 72.4
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 100
323% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 42.9
DQ Write 57.8
DQ Mixed 52.7
39% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 230% ↑
This bench: 287%
 Great: 442%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905734-063.A00G Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 9905734-063.A00G Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 9905734-403.A00G 9905734-403.A00G 159GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
32767, 16384, 32767, 16384, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 44.6
MC Mixed 30.5
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 7.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CELSIUS M7010power Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M7010power

CPU
Xeon W-2225IntelBench 79%, 523 samples9x
Xeon W-2245IntelBench 88%, 471 samples5x
Core i9-10920XIntel  $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples3x
GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples11x
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples2x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples2x
SSD
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00-1016 1TBWDCBench 253%, 16 samples6x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples3x
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1016 512GBWDCBench 221%, 197 samples3x
RAM
M393A2K43DB2-CVF 4x16GBSamsungBench 95%, 12 samples5x
M393A4K40DB2-CVF 4x31.8GBSamsungBench 76%, 22 samples3x
HMA82GR7DJR8N-WM 4x16GBHynixBench 89%, 41 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback