Huananzhi X79

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200608
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '23 at 14:33
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 60.2 2-Core 116 50% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 212 8-Core 250 30% 231 Pts	64-Core 565 35% 565 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(107D 2730) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 325 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	3.11% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5 Parallax 1.2 3% 3.3 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.2 3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.11% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB 6,044 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0918A0L SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 254 101 116 96 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Read 1,412 Write 239 Mixed 134 SusWrite 107 101% 473 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 11.2 85% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 89.8 111% 202 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 234%
Apacer AS350 256GB 5,875 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 146GB free Firmware: 3PE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 324 129 230 134 211 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Read 396 Write 107 Mixed 241 SusWrite 236 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 30.8 112% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 259 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 201 173% 252 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$23 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 102GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 98 98 99 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 95.7 Write 93 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 98.3 63% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0- 4x4GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 26.5 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	124x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	67x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	42x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
AS2280P4 256GBApacerBench 168%, 1,607 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	57x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	46x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16