Supermicro C9X299-PGF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro C9X299-PGF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C9X299-PGF
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 13:50
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993
CPU, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 69
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 157
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 818
71% 605 Pts
64-Core 2,362
146% 2,362 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
PNY(196E 1211) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 178
Parallax 167
135% 170 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 173
Splatting 118
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KB480G7 480GB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SCV10100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 299 329 307 323 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 283
Write 285
Mixed 312
SusWrite 317
68% 299 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 72.6
4K Mixed 26.3
98% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 220
179% 249 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 81%
Samsung MZQL2960HCJR-00A07 960GB
842GB free
Firmware: GDC5302Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1429 1439 1439 1438 1438 1437 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,182
Write 1,438
Mixed 1,748
SusWrite 1,437
381% 1,701 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 70.8
234% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 895
DQ Write 761
DQ Mixed 804
609% 820 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 285%
Great: 349%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-008.A00G 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 36
MC Write 50.5
MC Mixed 35.2
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 9.5
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C9X299-PGF Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO

System: Supermicro C9X299-PGF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,538
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback