TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Biostar H61MLV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H61MLV  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 00:25
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 75.7
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 139
58% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 202
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 54.2%
 Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 240
MSI(1462 2799) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 10
Parallax 10.9
6% 9.4 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 9.4
7% 8.93 fps
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 6.43%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11055
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 184 186 199 207 188 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.4% Average
Read 197
Write 196
Mixed 181
SusWrite 191
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 24.3
83% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 28.7
26% 37.3 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 47.4%
 Great: 98%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
268GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 127 125 128 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 108
Write 51.6
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 126
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 67.5%
 Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 33.5%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H61MLV Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MLV

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples22x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples15x
Core i3-2120Intel  $75Bench 51%, 77,810 samples12x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples21x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples9x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples11x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples4x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples3x
RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples6x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples3x
M378B5173EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 2,381 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback