HP Compaq dc7700p Small Form Factor

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	HP Compaq dc7700p Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A54h
Memory	2.1 GB free of 6.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20060830
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '23 at 16:36
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	69%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6600-$90 8,894 User benchmarks, average bench 37% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 35.1 33% 43.1 Pts	4-Core 35.5 8-Core 36 5% 35.8 Pts	64-Core 38.8 2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 4.2 3% 4.1 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 387GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 67 55 78 73 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 97.7 Write 111 Mixed 51.1 SusWrite 66.7 60% 81.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 345GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 69 60 78 75 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 174 Write 120 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 69.1 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 107%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 21GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 17 17 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 62.8 Write 17.6 Mixed 20.4 SusWrite 17.3 33% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.9 65% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 39GB 2,202 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024, 33792 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq dc7700p Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc7700p Small Form Factor

CPU
Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples	5x
Core2 6300Intel $40Bench 34%, 5,234 samples	3x
Core2 6400IntelBench 35%, 5,556 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1x
SSD2041A 120GB2-powerBench 68%, 115 samples	1x

RAM
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	4x
40GBUnknownBench 22%, 7,939 samples	2x
39GBUnknownBench 18%, 2,202 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $118

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16