Gigabyte GA-X99-UD7 WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD7 WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory14.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '23 at 14:17
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 160
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 470
46% 377 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000 12GB
Nvidia(10DE 1611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.67
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.9% Good
Lighting 82.9
Reflection 93.7
Parallax 84.9
68% 87.2 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 75
Splatting 75.8
68% 85.2 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6 Pro 512GB-$249
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 354 316 387 406 387 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 405
Mixed 290
SusWrite 373
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 37.4
124% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 224
198% 298 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 114%
WD WD6001FFWX-68Z39N0 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 213 212 213 212 212 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 241
Mixed 123
SusWrite 213
136% 186 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
394% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2133 C15 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 30.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 21
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD7 WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback