Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus Z10PE-D16 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory	220.4 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170310
Uptime	15.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '17 at 10:50
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 262 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	77.9% Very good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 111 2-Core 207 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 775 71% 597 Pts	64-Core 1,610 100% 1,610 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375D) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Lighting 19.4 Reflection 15.1 Parallax 18.2 16% 17.6 fps	MRender 16.2 Gravity 18.5 Splatting 20 15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 883GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	99% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 409 Mixed 416 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 81 4K Mixed 38.8 154% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 16 53% 107 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 133%
Kingston KC1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$320 1,236 User benchmarks, average bench 164% 441GB free Firmware: E7FT04.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 763 Write 711 Mixed 740 165% 738 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 23.7 78% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 413 DQ Write 396 DQ Mixed 163 189% 324 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 209%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 7.5TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 7TB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 55.7 Mixed 89.3 156% 214 MB/s	4K Read 2.82 4K Write 0.72 4K Mixed 0.77 216% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 164%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA8GL7MMR4N-UH 4x31.8GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 4 of 16 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	MC Read 59.6 MC Write 53.5 MC Mixed 47.9 153% 53.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16.1 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 84.6 47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 72%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31stBench 66%, 886 samples	24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples	22x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	26x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	22x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	18x

SSD
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD $74Bench 277%, 114,373 samples	11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	26x
HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 4x31.8GBHynixBench 85%, 82 samples	11x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $340

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16