TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210510
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 08 '23 at 13:43
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 81.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 225
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 675
68% 551 Pts
64-Core 917
57% 917 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 80.5%
 Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 3FF4)
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4346 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 222
Parallax 171
141% 189 fps
MRender 213
Gravity 158
Splatting 132
133% 167 fps
Poor: 116% ↑
This bench: 131%
 Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 94 36 87 117 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,647
Write 1,655
Mixed 1,237
SusWrite 103
259% 1,161 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 80.5
274% 95.3 MB/s
DQ Read 925
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 314
372% 650 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑
This bench: 194%
 Great: 295%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
34GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 321 321 320 320 308 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 464
Mixed 456
SusWrite 331
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 56
186% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 115%
 Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
634GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 160 162 162 161 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 82.2
Write 85.9
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 162
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 70.1%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3000C16-8GTZN BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FBD F4-3000C16-8GTZN 24GB
3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 27
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 24.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 79.3%
 Great: 98%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples88x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $175Bench 74%, 142,983 samples82x
GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples61x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples45x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples44x
SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $104Bench 310%, 455,997 samples35x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples33x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $994
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback