Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '23 at 08:25
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 69.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 290
89% 169 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,094
98% 829 Pts
64-Core 2,150
133% 2,150 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Asus(1043 04E4) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.4% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 123
Parallax 164
88% 132 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 120
Splatting 76.9
80% 99.9 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 357 364 223 286 367 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 488
Write 366
Mixed 301
SusWrite 326
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 36.8
130% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 172
136% 191 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 129%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
931GB free
Firmware: P2CR048 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1988 1955 1965 1969 1965 1970 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 1135
Write 1,970
Mixed 1,406
SusWrite 1,968
369% 1,620 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 68.1
227% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 1,058
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 873
659% 891 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 276%
Great: 299%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
931GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 52.8
Write 35.7
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 37.4
51% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.3% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 27.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 27.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,032
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback