Asus M51AC

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus M51AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51AC
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130725
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '17 at 07:18
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 85.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 219 79% 139 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 584 64% 507 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.99% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 6.88 3% 5.78 fps	MRender 9.38 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 7.87 5% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.99% Great: 3%
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 3666) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.63 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Lighting 6.77 Reflection 7.19 Parallax 8.09 6% 7.35 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 7.27 Splatting 7.22 5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 349GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1665 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 97 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 54 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3374503621	116% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 411 Mixed 416 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 92.6 4K Mixed 49.3 182% 62.7 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 132 149% 256 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 128 128 21494235433 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1562 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 34491 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 222 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1785 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1785 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 197570002975 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 137 137 21491810596 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1569 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 34372 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 222 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1792 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1792 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 206159806498 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	77.3% Very good	Read 176 Write 93.8 Mixed 125 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.03 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.24 100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GB 2,816 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.3% Above average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 14.3 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 17 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	388x
Core i7-4770SIntel $85Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	125x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	41x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	35x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $80Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	78x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	36x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S 2x8GBUnknownBench 56%, 671 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16