Asus PRIME A320M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-R  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 08 '23 at 00:01
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 189
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 591
57% 470 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1602 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.2% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 29.9
25% 30.7 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 30
Splatting 21
22% 28.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 60 38 72 25 113 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24% Poor
Read 149
Write 85.6
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 72.4
22% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 10.1
43% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
865GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 178 171 178 179 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 178
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 176
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
230% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EKRED4163216AD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 28.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 23.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-R Builds (Compare 626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback