Lenovo 10AHS21300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10AHS21300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 22:20
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 106
2-Core 204
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 473
51% 404 Pts
64-Core 461
29% 461 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 0.6
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN02SM19EG240GB 240GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 291 34 57 41 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 462
Write 401
Mixed 26
SusWrite 87.6
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 0.6
42% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 1.2
17% 44 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR1870EC58E9F1333 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AHS21300 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AHS21300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback