Lenovo 81F8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81F8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 17:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 41
2-Core 50.3
33% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 48.2
8-Core 52.6
7% 50.4 Pts
64-Core 51.7
3% 51.7 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 380F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.40.16
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 3.7
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 179 146 131 200 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 570
Write 306
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 181
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 16.7
47% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 118
92% 127 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
919GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 106 120 125 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 95.3
Write 126
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 119
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
94% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5704-001.A00G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81F8 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81F8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback