GPU GWTN156-7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGPU GWTN156-7  (all builds)
MotherboardGPU GPU Company
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211103
Uptime20.9 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 14:47
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 38.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 202
65% 123 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 262
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
9.64% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 13.7
9% 12.6 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 13.4
11% 14 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.64%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800S 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09124
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 280 248 277 293 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 292
Write 246
Mixed 259
SusWrite 273
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 12.7
44% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 91.3
DQ Mixed 160
113% 145 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 9.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 6.9
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 211
19% 211 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GWTN156-7 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: GPU GWTN156-7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback