Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16W1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 9SEXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16W1  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 20:06
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 190
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 463
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 12AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 131
Parallax 5.9
4% 47.2 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AI1 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 708 183 318 153 217 212 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,245
Write 1,107
Mixed 1,105
SusWrite 298
210% 939 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 63.3
218% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 771
570% 754 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 169%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.1% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 9.8
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 10
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16W1 Builds (Compare 4,917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback