HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161024
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 18:19
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800B APU (2012 D.Tr)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 66
2-Core 111
53% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 170
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
HP(103C 1850) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1007
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7.1
6% 7.3 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 6.9
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 182
Mixed 74.2
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
186% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion HDD 2TB
892GB free
Firmware: 1901
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.3
Write 32.4
Mixed 29.6
22% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
S M 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
29.8% Poor
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 MT Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback