BOXX APEXX S3_05

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBOXX APEXX S3_05  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock Z490 Taichi
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 16:12
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 292
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 1,141
101% 856 Pts
64-Core 1,947
120% 1,947 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.9% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 135
Parallax 125
96% 126 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 108
Splatting 118
107% 133 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 102%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1048 1027 1006 951 937 928 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,105
Write 1,640
Mixed 1,065
SusWrite 983
323% 1,448 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 60.7
221% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,226
DQ Write 906
DQ Mixed 982
757% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 259%
Great: 442%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 41142 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 30.4
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 29.9
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical APEXX S3_05 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO

System: BOXX APEXX S3_05

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback