Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A532

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK A532  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB2A
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180907
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 14:54
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 125
56% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 166
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C2) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 80 81 77 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 135
Write 102
Mixed 101
SusWrite 79.1
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 26.1
92% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 96.4
DQ Mixed 90.9
73% 102 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99P5471-006.A00DT 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 14.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK A532 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK A532

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback