Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory121.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 07:53
Run Duration413 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 219
79% 139 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 859
77% 651 Pts
64-Core 1,700
105% 1,700 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Asus(1043 87EB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 281
Reflection 353
Parallax 295
229% 310 fps
MRender 329
Gravity 237
Splatting 175
194% 247 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 194%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 905P Optane NVMe PCIe 960GB-$1,222
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010603 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1650 1640 1649 1679 1678 1691 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 1,834
Write 1679
Mixed 1,814
SusWrite 1,664
394% 1,748 MB/s
4K Read 104
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 94.8
327% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 646
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 571
429% 575 MB/s
Poor: 273%
This bench: 302%
Great: 551%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
931GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 460 459 465 462 455 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 403
Mixed 383
SusWrite 459
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 43.8
140% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 282
214% 291 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
561GB free
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1450 1459 1442 1452 1447 1455 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,879
Write 1038
Mixed 1,308
SusWrite 1,451
318% 1,419 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 62
198% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 718
DQ Write 497
DQ Mixed 636
467% 617 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 253%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1368 1378 1360 1369 1359 1368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,015
Write 1,047
Mixed 1,176
SusWrite 1367
312% 1,401 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 59.1
192% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 730
DQ Write 499
DQ Mixed 640
471% 623 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 251%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
411GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1346 1343 1351 1339 1346 1350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,045
Write 1,416
Mixed 1,376
SusWrite 1,346
346% 1,546 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 58.5
193% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 727
DQ Write 502
DQ Mixed 641
472% 623 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 251%
Great: 435%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
909GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1689 1687 1685 1685 1696 1734 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 1,937
Write 1,308
Mixed 1,524
SusWrite 1696
363% 1,616 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 63.4
203% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 644
472% 622 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 272%
Great: 508%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
828GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 461 461 469 468 472 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 416
Write 416
Mixed 385
SusWrite 464
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 42.6
136% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 282
214% 291 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 21.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback