Asus P8H61-M PLUS V2

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M PLUS V2 (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130916
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '23 at 05:15
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 190 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 311 41% 306 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 83BE) 1GB CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	8.69% Terrible	Lighting 9.9 Reflection 14.4 Parallax 10.5 8% 11.6 fps	MRender 15 Gravity 11.4 Splatting 10.6 10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.69% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 92 85 90 91 91 MB/s Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.6% Good	Read 260 Write 248 Mixed 230 SusWrite 108 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 65 4K Mixed 34.7 121% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 142 123% 183 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 83%
SSD 240GB 240GB 5,968 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 148GB free Firmware: HPS2227P SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 195 191 217 221 226 MB/s Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.5% Above average	Read 258 Write 227 Mixed 226 SusWrite 206 52% 229 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 65.5 4K Mixed 14.2 104% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 17.8 51% 109 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 90%
USB DISK 2.0 64GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 16GB free, PID 6310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 27 24 8.2 19 28 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Read 105 Write 14.2 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 21.3 36% 38.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG4N-DI 8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	MC Read 21.7 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18.3 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 18.5 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M PLUS V2 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PLUS V2

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	4x
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	4x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	3x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	5x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	3x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	2x

SSD
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	1x
Premier Pro SP920 512GBAdata $95Bench 80%, 303 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	1x
9905403-049.A01G 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 27 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $49

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16