Samsung 930XBE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 930XBE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT930XBE-K38W
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210720
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 04:41
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 56.3
1-Core 80
2-Core 68.9
45% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 224
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Sanyo(144D C16B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 6.4
5% 5.87 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000 256GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD72K1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 185 181 175 170 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 1,047
Write 725
Mixed 755
SusWrite 206
152% 683 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 27.3
96% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 408
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 348
254% 334 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 249%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 19.9
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 930XBE Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 930XBE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback