HP 500-589c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-589c  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B35
Memory7.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 22:55
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 84.1
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 115
54% 85.5 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 188
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90D3) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 10.5
6% 8.93 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 6.4
6% 7.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 123 125 126 126 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 385
Write 331
Mixed 231
SusWrite 146
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 41.7
148% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 144
137% 214 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 197 196 196 197 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 154
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 197
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 11
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-589c Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-589c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback