MSI B360M PRO-VDH (MS-7B24)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B24
MotherboardMSI B360M PRO-VDH (MS-7B24)  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190325
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 19:32
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14% Very poor
Memory 3.48
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 137
33% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 211
21% 171 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 14%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 65 72 72 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 295
Write 81.2
Mixed 107
SusWrite 71.6
30% 139 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 14.2
32% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 72.4
DQ Mixed 119
86% 112 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 100%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
134GB free
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 219 181 194 164 212 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.4% Below average
Read 273
Write 250
Mixed 218
SusWrite 196
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 7.2
28% 9.3 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 32.4
46% 85.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
108GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 95 110 117 116 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 67
Write 101
Mixed 49
SusWrite 106
59% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 859B CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 7.2
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 469
8% 469 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M PRO-VDH (MS-7B24) Builds (Compare 2,542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B360M PRO-VDH (MS-7B24)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $561
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback